Abstract
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a hot issue in global economic governance in recent years. The reform path of the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism has produced more obvious differences among different countries, and the existing propositions can be divided into three types: the progressive investment arbitration reform model, the judicial investment tribunal model and the Calvo doctrine return model. The different positions on reform paths have both their historic
ISDS机制改革与中国的应对方案-12367字.docx